Table of Contents
Ethnography #9
Alan Klima’s Ethnography #9—winner of the 2020 Bateson Prize—is a set of meditations on ghosts, numbers, and capitalist crisis in Thailand. As an experimental ethnographic critique of secular materialism, Klima’s “gothic ethnography” calls into question “the real” through stories that interweave ghosts, godmothers, and non-secular forms of abstraction.
The review essays in this series are also unconventional, reflective, speculative, and experimental. They do not necessarily follow the logic and structure of the book. Nor do they summarize Ethnography #9. Indeed, Klima’s ethnographic meditations refuse a singular or a linear narrative—a reader has to begin to learn to read differently as he encounters the materials in the text. As you will find out, the reviewers in this series are skillful writers. But they are also good readers. They pay close attention to sentences, utterances, images, concepts, and the in-between spaces. This is no easy task. Sometimes they would take a small phrase, or a tiny figure, and place them under a different light to generate something new. The new materials the reviewers bring to our attention are as interesting as Klima’s text itself.
Tanzeen Rashed Doha introduces the symposium by engaging with the texts (the author’s and the reviewers’) from within to think about secular history’s destabilization by the dynamic between the ethereal and the corporeal. Rajbir Singh Judge thinks with Klima's work in relation to the interpretive requirements of the social sciences and queries the orientation of our own desire. Gil Anidjar asks us to think about numbers and ghosts--numbers that proliferate around us today especially as the pandemic rages. Erica Robles-Anderson considers Klima’s work as a media theorist and raises important questions about motherhood, screens, and gender, urging us to examine where theorization emerges. Lastly, Allen Feldman’s essay proposes hauntology as the ontology of both late capitalism and western anthropological gaze.The symposium concludes with Alan Klima’s response to our reviewers' comments and questions.